The Prussian Model of Education: History, Impact, and Controversies

The Prussian education system, a product of late 18th and early 19th-century reforms in Prussia, has exerted a profound and lasting influence on education systems worldwide. While the term "Prussian model" isn't commonly used in German academic circles (where the focus is on the "Prussian reforms" and the Humboldtian education ideal), the underlying principles have sparked ongoing debates and controversies.

Origins and Foundations

The genesis of the Prussian education system can be traced to Frederick the Great, who, in 1763, issued the Generallandschulreglement. This decree, drafted by Johann Julius Hecker, laid the groundwork for a universal primary education system. Hecker, who had previously established the first Prussian teachers' seminary in 1748, gained the King's favor with his idea of training teachers to cultivate mulberries for homespun silk, a project Frederick enthusiastically supported. A memorial in Berlin honors Johann Julius Hecker for founding the first Prussian teachers' seminary in 1748.

Key Features of the Prussian System

Frederick the Great's decree significantly broadened the existing schooling system, mandating education for all young citizens, both boys and girls, from ages 5 to 13 or 14. These schools were primarily funded by municipalities. The core of the system was the Volksschule, an eight-year primary education course. The curriculum focused on practical skills like reading and writing, alongside music (singing) and religious (Christian) education, delivered in collaboration with churches. A strict emphasis was placed on instilling values of duty, sobriety, and discipline. While mathematics and calculus were not initially compulsory, they could be pursued for an additional fee. School construction was supported by the state but often relied on private initiatives, such as the school founded by Friedrich Eberhard von Rochow in Reckahn, Brandenburg, in cooperation with the talented teacher Heinrich Julius Bruns (1746-1794). Mark 10:14 is quoted at the entrance to the School Museum in Reckahn, Brandenburg an der Havel.

The Prussian system achieved several milestones, including compulsory attendance, specialized teacher training, national testing for all students, a standardized national curriculum for each grade, and mandatory kindergarten. Teacher training was increasingly formalized through private seminaries, with Hecker's 1748 "Lehrerseminar" marking an early example. The density and impact of these seminaries grew substantially by the end of the 18th century.

Advancements in Teacher Training and Curriculum

In 1810, Prussia introduced state certification requirements for teachers, significantly elevating teaching standards. The Abitur, a final examination, was introduced in 1788 and implemented across all Prussian secondary schools by 1812. By 1871, it was extended to all of Germany. Passing the Abitur became a prerequisite for entering learned professions and higher civil service positions.

The Humboldtian Ideal and Academic Freedom

The underlying Humboldtian educational ideal, championed by brothers Alexander and Wilhelm von Humboldt, went beyond primary education. It championed academic freedom and the development of cosmopolitan and patriotic citizens from the earliest stages of education. Wilhelm von Humboldt, appointed minister of education in 1809, advocated for a broad, general education rooted in neohumanist ideals, free from restrictions based on status, profession, or wealth. This vision promoted generic education based on a neohumanist ideal of broad general knowledge, in full academic freedom without any determination or restriction by status, profession or wealth.

The Rise of the Research University

The 19th-century German states, particularly Prussia, became global leaders in education. Free public education was widely accessible for boys, and the gymnasium system for elite students was highly professionalized. The modern university system evolved from German universities, notably the Friedrich Wilhelm University (now Humboldt University of Berlin), which pioneered the research university model with structured career paths for professors. The United States and other nations closely observed these German models.

Social Context and Motivations for Reform

Major drivers for educational improvements in Prussia originated from the middle and upper-middle classes, spearheaded by the Bildungsbürgertum. The system's advocates overcame resistance due to foreign pressure and internal failures, especially after Prussia's defeat in the early Napoleonic Wars. In 1807, Johann Gottlieb Fichte called for a new form of education in his Addresses to the German Nation. Various German national movement leaders engaged themselves in educational reform.

Language and National Identity

By 1870, the Prussian system began to favor High German as the official language, impacting ethnic groups like Poles, Sorbs, and Danes residing in Prussia and other German states.

Pietism and the Role of the Church

Pietism, a reformist movement within Lutheranism, formed a political alliance with the King of Prussia, driven by a shared interest in diminishing the Lutheran state church's dominance. With royal support, Pietism effectively replaced the Lutheran church as the state religion by the 1760s. Pietist theology emphasized "inner spirituality," to be discovered through reading Scripture. Prussia leveraged the Protestant Church as a partner in establishing its educational system.

Centralization and Administration

Prussian ministers, especially Karl Abraham Freiherr von Zedlitz, aimed to establish a more centralized, uniform system administered by the state during the 18th century. The Prussian General Land Law of 1794 marked a significant step in this direction. However, a complex system of burden-sharing between municipalities and state administration for primary and secondary education persists in Germany today.

Teachers and Social Change

Generations of Prussian and German teachers, who initially often lacked formal education and were sometimes untrained former petty officers, sought greater academic recognition, training, and better pay. They played a significant role in various protest and reform movements from the 19th into the 20th century.

Impact and Spread of the Prussian Model

The Prussian reforms in education quickly spread across Europe, particularly after the French Revolution. The Napoleonic Wars first allowed the system to be enhanced after the 1806 crushing defeat of Prussia itself and then to spread in parallel with the rise and territorial gains of Prussia after the Vienna Congress. While the Russian Empire remained conservative regarding common education, the German ruling class in Estonia and Latvia successfully introduced the system under Russian rule. The Prussian principles were adopted by the governments in Norway and Sweden to create the basis of the primary (grundskola) and secondary (gymnasium) schools across Scandinavia. Unlike in Prussia, the Swedish system aimed to expand even secondary schooling to the peasants and workers. As well in Finland, then a Russian grand duchy with a strong Swedish elite, the system was adopted. Education and the propagation of the national epic, the Kalevala, was crucial for the Finnish nationalist Fennoman movement. France and the UK failed until the 1880s to introduce compulsory education, France due to conflicts between a radical secular state and the Catholic Church. In Scotland, local church-controlled schools were replaced by a state system in 1872. In England and Wales, the government started to subsidise schooling in 1833, various measures followed till a local School Boards were set up under the Forster Act of 1870, local School Boards providing free (taxpayer financed) and compulsory schooling were made universal in England and Wales by the Act of 1891, schooling having been made compulsory by the Act of 1880.

Early 19th-century American educators were also fascinated by German educational trends. In 1818, John Griscom gave a favorable report of Prussian education. English translations were made of French philosopher Victor Cousin's work, Report on the State of Public Education in Prussia. Calvin E. Stowe, Henry Barnard, Horace Mann, George Bancroft and Joseph Cogswell all had a vigorous interest in German education. The Prussian approach was used for example in the Michigan Constitution of 1835, which fully embraced the Prussian system by introducing a range of primary schools, secondary schools, and the University of Michigan itself, all administered by the state and supported with tax-based funding. In 1843, Mann traveled to Germany to investigate how the educational process worked. Upon his return to the United States, he incorporated his experiences in his advocacy for the common school movement in Massachusetts. Mann persuaded his fellow modernizers, especially those in his Whig Party, to legislate tax-supported elementary public education in their states. New York state soon set up the same method in 12 different schools on a trial basis.

Military Reforms and Industrial Culture

Early Prussian reformers took major steps to abandon both serfdom and the line formation as early as 1807 and introduced mission-type tactics in the Prussian military in the same year. The latter enlarged freedom in execution of overall military strategies and had a major influence in the German and Prussian industrial culture, which profited from the Prussian reformers' introduction of greater economic freedom. The mission-type concept, which was kept by later German armed forces, required a high level of understanding, literacy (and intense training and education) at all levels and actively invited involvement and independent decision making by the lower ranks.

Post-Monarchy and Continued Influence

In 1918, the Kingdom of Prussia became a republic. Socialist Konrad Haenisch, the first education minister (Kultusminister), denounced what he called the "demons of morbid subservience, mistrust, and lies" in secondary schools. However, Haenisch's and other radical left approaches were rather short-lived. After 1945, the Weimar educational compromise again set the tone for the reconstruction of the state-specific educational system as laid out in the Prussian model. In 1946 the US occupation forces failed completely in their attempt to install comprehensive and secular schooling in the US Occupation Zone.

The fiercest defender of the originally Prussian tripartite concept and humanist educational tradition was archconservative Alois Hundhammer, a former Bavarian monarchist, devout Catholic enemy of the Nazis and (with regard to the individual statehood of Bavaria) firebrand anti-Prussian coauthor of the 1946 Constitution of Bavaria. Hundhammer, as soon as he was appointed Bavarian minister of Culture and Education, was quick to use the newly granted freedoms, attacking Alexander in radio speeches and raising rumors about Alexander's secularism, which led to parents' and teachers' associations expressing fears about a reduction in the quality of education. Hundhammer involved Michael von Faulhaber, Archbishop of Munich, to contact New York Cardinal Francis J.

Controversies and Criticisms

The Prussian legacy of a mainly tripartite system of education with less comprehensive schooling and selection of children as early as the fourth grade has led to controversies that persist to the present. It has been deemed to reflect 19th-century thinking along class lines.

One of the basic tenets of the specific Prussian system is expressed in the fact that education in Germany is, against the aim of the 19th-century national movement, not directed by the federal government. The Humboldt approach, a central pillar of the Prussian system and of German education to the present day, is still influential and being used in various discussions. The present German universities charge no or moderate tuition fees. Germany still focuses on a broad Allgemeinbildung (both 'generic knowledge' and 'knowledge for the common people') and provides an internationally recognized in-depth dual-track vocational education system but leaves educational responsibility to individual states.

The Prussian Model in the United States: A Critical Perspective

Some critics argue that the Prussian model, when adopted in the United States, was intended to create a submissive and easily controlled population. They point to the emphasis on obedience, standardization, and the suppression of individual thought as evidence of this intention. Figures like Horace Mann, who studied the Prussian system, are seen as instrumental in bringing these principles to American education.

John Taylor Gatto, a retired public school teacher, argued that the public school system teaches students "The Seven Lessons": confusion, emotional dependency, intellectual dependency, provisional self-esteem, and the inability to hide. These lessons, according to Gatto, result in children who are submissive, indifferent, ignorant, and dependent.

The Broader Context of Education and Social Control

Studies suggest that education reforms, including the rise of mandatory primary schooling, are often implemented after periods of social unrest to indoctrinate people into accepting the status quo. The Prussian education system, for example, was conceived as a long-term solution to social unrest caused by peasant rebellions in the 1740s and 1750s.

tags: #prussian #model #of #education #history