The New England Commission on Higher Education: Ensuring Quality in Higher Education
The New England Commission on Higher Education (NECHE) plays a vital role in maintaining and enhancing the quality of higher education institutions. As one of the seven regional accrediting commissions in the United States, NECHE provides institutional accreditation to approximately 220 institutions in the six-state New England region, as well as several American-style institutions overseas.
What is NECHE?
NECHE is a voluntary, peer-based, non-profit membership organization committed to promoting educational excellence and quality assurance. It serves as a reliable authority and independent voice on the quality of higher education. This is achieved through peer evaluation and accreditation of public and private universities and colleges.
History and Evolution
Dating back over 130 years, NECHE was formerly known as the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC). The organization's evolution reflects its ongoing adaptation to the changing landscape of higher education.
Mission and Purpose
NECHE's primary purpose is to ensure that accredited institutions meet or exceed established criteria for institutional quality. This is achieved through a rigorous peer review process that assesses various aspects of an institution's operations and academic programs.
Membership and Governance
The Commission is a voluntary, peer-based member association. It consists of faculty, administrators, and trustees from affiliated institutions, as well as members of the public. The NECHE staff is headed by a President.
Read also: Your Guide to New England Colleges
Accreditation by NECHE
Accreditation by NECHE signifies that an institution meets or exceeds the criteria for assessing institutional quality. This process involves a periodic peer review. An accredited college or university demonstrates the necessary resources to achieve its stated purposes through appropriate educational programs. It also gives reasonable evidence that it will continue to do so in the foreseeable future. Institutional integrity is also addressed through accreditation. Accreditation applies to the institution as a whole, not to individual courses or programs.
Standards for Accreditation
NECHE has established Standards for Accreditation to ensure quality, innovation, and student success. These standards serve as a framework for evaluating institutions and guiding them through the accreditation process.
The Accreditation Process
The accreditation process involves several key steps:
Self-Study: The institution undertakes a comprehensive self-study, addressing NECHE's Standards for Accreditation. This self-study presents a picture of the institution. It considers its history, present state, and vision for the future. Effective self-study serves accreditation’s dual purposes: quality assurance and institutional improvement.
Evaluation Team Visit: An evaluation team of faculty and administrators visits the institution to gather evidence that the self-study is thorough and accurate. This on-site evaluation provides the institution and NECHE with an external perspective. Team members are selected based on their experience at comparable institutions.
Read also: The NEASC Accreditation Process
Team Report: After the visit, the team chair prepares a draft report, which is reviewed by the team and NECHE staff. The staff review ensures that the report is comprehensive and addresses all important areas. The draft report is then sent to the institution's president for factual verification. The chair sends the final version of the team report to the institution and NECHE.
Commission Review: The Commission reviews the self-study, team report, and any other relevant documents. The institution's president and team chair are invited to meet with the Commission to discuss the evaluation. In addition, NECHE considers Public Comment regarding each evaluated institution.
Commission Action: Following the review process, the Commission takes final action on the institution's accreditation status. The institution and the review team are then notified of the Commission's decision. The Range and Meaning of Commission Actions Affecting Institutional Status outlines the actions the Commission may take.
Comprehensive Evaluation
The Commission requires institutions to undergo a comprehensive evaluation at least every ten years.
Public Comments
NECHE seeks and considers Public Comment regarding each evaluated institution. Public Comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of the institution. The Commission cannot settle disputes between individuals and institutions. Comments are not treated as confidential and must include the name, address, and telephone number of the person providing the comments.
Read also: BU: Courses and Programs
Recent NECHE Visits
The most recent NECHE evaluation team visit to Rhode Island College was on November 7 - 10, 2021. NECO underwent a comprehensive site visit in November 2022. NECO has been accredited by the Commission since 1976 and was last reviewed in 2022.
The Role of Self-Study
Self-study is at the heart of accreditation. Effective self-study serves accreditation’s dual purposes: quality assurance and institutional improvement.
Key Aspects of Institutional Quality
NECHE's standards address various aspects of institutional quality, including:
Mission and Purposes
The institution's mission and purposes are appropriate to higher education. They are consistent with its charter or other operating authority, and implemented in a manner that complies with NECHE's Standards. The institution’s mission gives direction to its activities and provides a basis for the assessment and enhancement of the institution’s effectiveness.
The mission of the institution defines its distinctive character, addresses the needs of society, identifies the students the institution seeks to serve, and reflects both the institution’s traditions and its vision for the future. The institution’s mission provides the basis upon which the institution identifies its priorities, plans its future, and evaluates its endeavors; it provides a basis for the evaluation of the institution against the Commission’s Standards.
The institution’s mission statement is formally adopted by the governing board and appears in appropriate printed and digital institutional publications. The institution’s purposes are concrete and realistic and further define its educational and other dimensions, including scholarship, research, and public service.
Planning and Evaluation
The institution undertakes planning and evaluation to accomplish and improve the achievement of its mission and purposes. It identifies its planning and evaluation priorities and pursues them effectively. The institution demonstrates its success in strategic, academic, financial, and other resource planning and the evaluation of its educational effectiveness.
Planning and evaluation are systematic, comprehensive, broad-based, integrated, and appropriate to the institution. They involve the participation of individuals and groups responsible for the achievement of institutional purposes and include external perspectives. Results of planning and evaluation are regularly communicated to appropriate institutional constituencies. The institution allocates sufficient resources for its planning and evaluation efforts.
Institutional research is sufficient to support planning and evaluation. The institution systematically collects and uses data necessary to support its planning efforts and to enhance institutional effectiveness.
The institution plans beyond a short-term horizon, including strategic planning that involves realistic analyses of internal and external opportunities and constraints. The results of strategic planning are implemented in all units of the institution through financial, academic, enrollment, and other supporting plans.
The institution plans for and responds to financial and other contingencies, establishes feasible priorities, and develops a realistic course of action to achieve identified objectives. Institutional decision-making, particularly the allocation of resources, is consistent with planning priorities. The institution has a demonstrable record of success in implementing the results of its planning.
The institution regularly and systematically evaluates the achievement of its mission and purposes, the quality of its academic programs, and the effectiveness of its operational and administrative activities, giving primary focus to the realization of its educational objectives. Its system of evaluation is designed to provide valid information to support institutional improvement. The institution’s evaluation efforts are effective for addressing its unique circumstances. These efforts use both quantitative and qualitative methods.
The institution’s principal evaluation focus is the quality, integrity, and effectiveness of its academic programs. Evaluation endeavors and systematic assessment are demonstrably effective in the improvement of academic offerings, student learning, and the student experience.
Governance
The institution has a system of governance that facilitates the accomplishment of its mission and purposes and supports institutional effectiveness and integrity. Through its organizational design and governance structure, the institution creates and sustains an environment that encourages teaching, learning, service, scholarship, and where appropriate, research and creative activity. It demonstrates administrative capacity by assuring provision of support adequate for the appropriate functioning of each organizational component. The institution has sufficient autonomy and control of its programs and operations consistent with its mission to be held directly accountable for meeting the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation.
The authority, responsibilities, and relationships among the governing board, administration, faculty, staff, and sponsoring entity (if any) are clearly described in the institution’s by-laws, or an equivalent document, and in a table of organization that displays the working order of the institution. The board, administration, staff, faculty, and sponsoring entity understand and fulfill their respective roles as set forth in the institution’s official documents and are provided with the appropriate information to undertake their respective roles.
The institution’s organizational structure, decision-making processes, and policies are clear and consistent with its mission and support institutional effectiveness. The institution’s system of governance involves the participation of all appropriate constituencies and includes regular communication among them.
Governing Board
The governing board is the legally constituted body ultimately responsible for the institution’s quality and integrity. Where the institution’s ownership or affiliation structure or other circumstances or requirements may involve more than one legally constituted body with authority, the institution demonstrates that the governing body with direct responsibility for the institution’s quality and integrity has sufficient autonomy and control to be held accountable for meeting the Commission’s Standards and to ensure that it can act in the institution’s best interest and that the legally constituted bodies with authority have an aligned understanding of their respective roles.
The board assures representation of the public interest in its composition and reflects the areas of competence needed to fulfill its responsibilities. Two-thirds or more of the board members, including the chair, are free of any personal or immediate familial financial interest in the institution, including as employee, stockholder or shareholder, corporate director, or contractor.
Members of the governing board understand, accept, and fulfill their responsibilities as fiduciaries to act honestly and in good faith in the best interest of the institution toward the achievement of its educational purposes in a manner free from conflicts of interest.
In multi-campus systems organized under a single governing board, the division of responsibility and authority between the system office and the institution is clear. Where system and campus boards share governance responsibilities or dimensions of authority, system policies and procedures are clearly defined and equitably administered relative to the mission of the institution.
The board has a clear understanding of the institution’s distinctive mission and exercises the authority to ensure the realization of institutional mission and purposes. The board approves and reviews institutional policies; monitors the institution’s fiscal condition; and approves major new initiatives, assuring that they are compatible with institutional mission and capacity. These policies are developed in consultation with appropriate constituencies. The board assures that the institution periodically reviews its success in fulfilling its mission and serving its students. The Board is effective in helping the institution make strategic decisions and confront unforeseen circumstances. It regularly reviews the institution’s systems of enterprise risk management, external audits, regulatory compliance, internal controls, and contingency management. The board assures appropriate attention is given to succession planning for institutional leadership and, where applicable, the composition of the board itself.
The board systematically develops, ensures, and enhances its own effectiveness through orientation, professional development, effective self-assessment, and regular evaluation including an external perspective. The board addresses its goals for diversity within its membership. Its role and functions are effectively carried out through appropriate committees and meetings.
Utilizing the institutional governance structure, the board establishes and maintains appropriate and productive channels of communication among its members and with the institutional community.
The board appoints and periodically reviews the performance of the chief executive officer whose full-time or major responsibility is to the institution.
The board delegates to the chief executive officer and, as appropriate, to others the requisite authority and autonomy to manage the institution compatible with the board’s intentions and the institution’s mission. In exercising its fiduciary responsibility, the governing board assures that senior officers identify, assess, and manage risks and ensure regulatory compliance.
Internal Governance
The chief executive officer, through an appropriate administrative structure, effectively manages the institution so as to fulfill its purposes and objectives and establishes the means to assess the effectiveness of the institution. The chief executive officer manages and allocates resources in keeping with institutional purposes and objectives and assesses the effectiveness of the institution. The chief executive officer assures that the institution employs faculty and staff sufficient in role, number, and qualifications appropriate to the institution’s mission, size, and scope.
In accordance with established institutional mechanisms and procedures, the chief executive officer and senior administrators consult with faculty, students, other administrators, and staff, and are appropriately responsive to their concerns, needs, and initiatives. The institution’s internal governance provides for the appropriate participation of its constituencies, promotes communications, and effectively advances the quality of the institution.
The institution’s chief academic officer is directly responsible to the chief executive officer, and in concert with the faculty and other academic administrators, is responsible for the quality of the academic program. The institution’s organization and governance structure assure the integrity and quality of academic programming however and wherever offered. Off-campus, continuing education, distance education, correspondence education, international, evening, and weekend programs are clearly integrated and incorporated into the policy formation, academic oversight, and evaluation system of the institution.
The institution places primary responsibility for the content, quality, and effectiveness of the curriculum with its faculty. Faculty have a substantive voice in matters of educational programs, faculty personnel, and other aspects of institutional policy that relate to their areas of responsibility and expertise.
The system of governance makes provisions for consideration of student views and judgments in those matters in which students have a direct and reasonable interest.
Through its system of board and internal governance, the institution ensures the appropriate consideration of relevant perspectives; decision-making aligned with expertise and responsibility; and timely action on institutional plans, policies, curricular change, and other key considerations.
The institution using contractual arrangements, consortial or other written agreements involving credits and degrees, the delivery of coursework, the assessment of student achievement, or the recruitment or support of students regularly reviews the effectiveness of such arrangements and negotiates appropriate changes. Consistent with Commission policy, the institution maintains sufficient control over the arrangements to ensure quality in the academic program and services for students and prospective students, including the ability to modify the agreements as needed. Written agreements provide for the termination or phasing out of such arrangements as circumstances warrant, and the institution develops appropriate exit strategies as needed.
Academic Programs
The institution’s academic programs are consistent with and serve to fulfill its mission and purposes. The institution works systematically and effectively to plan, provide, oversee, evaluate, improve, and assure the academic quality and integrity of its academic programs and the credits and degrees awarded. The institution sets a standard of student achievement appropriate to the degree or certificate awarded and develops the systematic means to understand how and what students are learning and to use the evidence obtained to improve the academic program.
The institution offers collegiate-level programs consisting of a curriculum of studies that leads to a degree in a recognized field of study and requires at least one year to complete. The institution for which the associate’s degree is the highest awarded offers at least one program in liberal studies or another area of study widely available at the baccalaureate level of regionally accredited colleges and universities.
The institution publishes the learning goals and requirements for each program. Such goals include the knowledge, intellectual and academic skills, competencies, and methods of inquiry to be acquired. In addition, if relevant to the program, goals include creative abilities and values to be developed and specific career-preparation practices to be mastered.
Programs leading to degrees or other awards have a coherent design and are characterized by appropriate breadth, depth, continuity, sequential progression, and synthesis of learning. Coherence is demonstrated through learning goals, structure, and content; policies and procedures for admission, retention, and completion; instructional methods and procedures; and the nature, quality, and extent of student learning and achievement.
tags: #new #england #commission #of #higher #education
