NCAA Pole Vault Rankings: A Decade of Dominance and Rising Stars
The world of NCAA pole vaulting is a dynamic arena where athletes push the boundaries of human capability, combining technical skill with raw power and mental fortitude. Over the past decade, certain athletes have consistently risen to the top, leaving an indelible mark on the sport. This article delves into the statistics and rankings of NCAA pole vaulters, highlighting the dominant figures, emerging talents, and key trends shaping the landscape.
The Reign of American Stars
American stars Sandi Morris and Katie Moon have dominated the World No. 1 rankings in the last decade. Their rivalry and shared success have significantly influenced the sport, with their performances at major championships setting new standards. The pair went 1-2 in both the WC and DL Final.
Katie Moon: Overcoming Adversity
Katie Moon shone at No. 1 again after an injury-marred ’24 season that saw her at No. 4, her lowest ranking since ’19. Moon's resilience and ability to bounce back from setbacks underscore her mental toughness and commitment to excellence. She is only 3 off Stacy Dragila’s hold on No. 1.
International Competitors
While American athletes have traditionally held a strong presence in pole vaulting, international competitors have also made significant strides, adding depth and excitement to the NCAA rankings.
Molly Caudery: A Rising Star
Britain’s rising star Molly Caudery ruptured a ligament in her ankle while warming up for Tokyo qualifying and had to withdraw.
Read also: Anthony Robles: Overcoming Obstacles
NCAA Pole Vault Rankings
The rankings reflect a combination of consistency, performance in major competitions, and overall technical skill.
2016
- Morris
2018
- Morris
2022
- Morris
2021
- Moon
2023
- Moon
2025
- Moon
Other Notable Rankings:
- Grove
- Molinarolo
- Sutej
- Svabikova
- H. Moll
- Ayris
- Bonnin
- McTaggart
- Moser
- Leon
- Bruni
- Klekner
- Bachmann
- A. Moll
- Campbell
- Pujol
- Mooneyhan
- Mulla
- Lueking
- Timberg
- Lampela
- Vekemans
Rankings Breakdown by Year:
- 1: 1)St.
- 1: 1) Grove; 2.
- 1: 1) Molinarolo; 2. Sutej; 3. Svabikova; 4.
- 1: 1) Caudery; 2t. Moon; 2t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. H. Moll; 4. Ayris; 5. 6t. Grove; 6t.
- 1: 1) Bonnin; 2. Sutej; 3.
- 1: 1) McTaggart; 2. Moon; 3. Moser; 4.
- 1: 1) Sutej; 2. McTaggart; 3.
- 1: 1) Bonnin; 2.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Sutej; 3. Leon; 4.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2t. Leon; 2t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3.
- 1: 1) Svabikova; 2.
- 1: 1) McTaggart; 2. Moon; 2. Morris; 3.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Sutej; 4. 5.
- 1: 1) Caudery; 2t. Moon; 2t. Bruni; 4t. Grove; 4t.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2t. Leon; 2t.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2. Moser; 3. Bruni; 4. Leon; 5.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Grove; 4. Moser; 5.
- 1: 1) Svabikova; 2.
- 1: 1) McTaggart; 2. Moon; 3. Moser; 4. Grove; 5t. 5t.
- 1: 1t. Moser; 1t. Klekner; 1t. Bachmann; 4t. Svabikova; 4t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. H. Moll; 4. Ayris; 5.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Grove; 4.
- 1: 1) Sutej; 2.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. Sutej; 4. Bonnin; 4.
- 1: 1) Moser; 2. Bonnin; 3. Bruni; 4.
- 1: 1) Moser; 2. Sutej; 3. Bonnin; 4. Lampela; 5.
- 1: 1) Bonnin; 2. Sutej; 3. Moser; 4.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2t. Leon; 2t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Grove; 4.
- 1: 1) McTaggart; 2. Moon; 3. Moser; 4.
- 1: 1) Molinarolo; 2.
- 1: 1t. Moser; 1t. Klekner; 1t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. H. Moll; 4.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3.
- 1: 1) H.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2. Bonnin; 2. Klekner; 3. King; 4. H. Moll; 5. 6. Mulla; 7.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. H. Moll; 4. Ayris; 5. 6t. Grove; 6Sutej; 8t. Vekemans; 8t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Sutej; 4. Svábíková; 5.
- 1: 1) A.
- 1: 4)Mt. Campbell; 2. Pujol; 2.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2. Moon; 3. A.
- 1: 1) Bonnin; 2. Klekner; 3.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Morris; 3. Sutej; 4. Svábíková; 5.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Mooneyhan; 3. Mulla; 3.
- 1: 1) Lueking; 2.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Bonnin; 2. Sutej; 3. Moser; 4. Caudery; 5. 5. Leon; 7. Molinarolo; 7.
- 1: 1) Caudery; 2t. Moon; 2t.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Sutej; 3. Leon; 4. Ayris; 5t. 5t.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2. Moser; 3. Bruni; 4. Leon; 5.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2.
- 1: 1) McTaggart; 2. Moon; 3.
- 1: 1) Morris; 2. Moon; 3. A. Moll; 4. H. Moll; 5. 6. Timberg; 7.
- 1: 1) Moon; 2. Caudery; 3. H. Moll; 4. Ayris; 5.
Subscription Options
For enthusiasts and professionals seeking in-depth coverage of track and field events, including pole vaulting, several subscription options are available:
- Digital Only Subscription: Access to current articles, issues, Track Results Newsletter, and unlimited content from Technique Journal and Track Coach for $88 per year (recurring).
- Digital Only Premium Archive: Unlimited access to archived issues, Track Results Newsletter, and content from Technique Journal and Track Coach for $138 per year (recurring).
- Print + Digital Subscription: Includes access to current articles, issues, Track Results Newsletter, content from Technique Journal and Track Coach, and 12 monthly print issues. Prices vary by location: $125.00 USA, $173.00 Canada, and $223.00 Foreign per year (recurring).
- Print + Digital Premium Archive: Offers unlimited access to archived issues, Track Results Newsletter, content from Technique Journal and Track Coach, and 12 monthly print issues. Prices vary by location: $175.00 USA, $223.00 Canada, and $273.00 Foreign per year (recurring).
- Print Only Subscription: 12 monthly print issues without online access or eTrack Results Newsletter. Prices vary by location: $89.00 USA, $137.00 Canada, and $187.00 Foreign per year (recurring).
- Track Coach (Digital Only): Quarterly Technique Journal with access to archived issues. Note: Included with all Track & Field News digital subscriptions.
Read also: Crafting Your NCAA Profile
Read also: The Return of College Football Gaming
tags: #ncaa #pole #vault #rankings #statistics
